The Transmedia Hijack (or How Transmedia is the New Dihydrogen Monoxide)

Posted on 21st March 2011 in ARG, Creativity, Personal, Tech/Entertainment

I can’t believe I’m going here, as this whole topic must seem so lame to so many people, but here goes…

So it seems that my recent trip to SXSW in Austin and my subsequent outburst of frustration on Twitter about the misuse of the term Transmedia has caused a little bit of a stir.

I came back and, well, vented on Twitter about how everyone there seemed to bandy about the term when they were talking about not storytelling, but some form of franchising or media extension of an existing or new property, or narrative world, whatever the heck that means.

“Franchising isn’t transmedia, it’s FRANCHISING!!” I screamed. And it turns out I wasn’t the only one having trouble with the term and how it’s being used. Plenty of folks have been seeming to jump onto the anti-transmedia bandwagon (and I’m fine with that).

Even Felicia Day got into the fray during one of her SXSW panels, and in a way, she nailed what many of us in Transmedia Storytelling have been struggling to express for years. Here’s what she had to say about the term (emphases mine):

It’s just a really stupid word, and people use it because they don’t know…they just want to like…I just hate it! Because what does it mean? It means nothing!!

I mean, listen: “Transmedia” is any comic book that ever became a movie, before the internet. I mean it’s just (any novelization of a movie), yes! That’s “Transmedia!” I mean, it doesn’t mean anything, I don’t think that….they’re just throwing it around ’cause it’s a catch-phrase, and it’s like “yes, let’s create a webseries that could potentially be a TV show that could potentially become a movie.” That’s not Transmedia.

I mean, I think what people are aspiring to, and what people are maybe, you know, could use better words or just articulate better, is that there is an opportunity to reinvent storytelling. So that, if I sat down and I created an app, let’s just say, and every day I would tell the story in a different way.

So I would release a comic panel, then I’d release a piece of video, and then I would release a set of pictures, and then I would tell a story in so many different ways that would accumulate in a way that essentially would be like a movie from beginning to end.

And you could use a different media device, because we are in a world where all of that is amalgamated in a way that is unique to what we’re living in and the tools we’re using.

So maybe that’s what we might do? But sometimes people just use it like “We’re just gonna do a TV show that’s gonna be a webseries and then a TV show.”

So look, it seems like things have reached a boiling point. I mean, c’mon, if Felicia Day herself rolls her eyes at the term, it’s time to do something about it. Well, or try to figure out if anything can be done.

And so here’s what I think. Some of you aren’t going to like this. Ready?

There’s nothing to be done.

Pandora’s Box is open, the cat’s out of the bag, the horses have been stolen, (insert cliché here). The term is pretty useless (as are clichés), as it’s popularly being used to describe something that’s been around for a long, long time. It reminds me of the prank that Penn & Teller pulled on folks asking them to sign a petition against the use of dihydrogen monoxide in all our food. It’s just a new buzz-term for something there are already plenty of perfectly good  words for (none of which I’ll list here, thank you).

Now, let me be clear: I’m not bashing anyone or their work. It’s a Great Big Beautiful Tomorrow, and there are only so many words to go around to describe new things. I just think it’s time I abandon the use of transmedia to describe the work that I do. This doesn’t mean that I forsake or forbid its use, I just won’t be describing my own stuff as such, even though others may continue to for a while.

So……what will I call what I do? Well, I’m not sure what will stick, but I’m going to go with what we’re calling it around the office: Alternate Reality Entertainment.

I’m not suggesting we change the term. All I know is that “Transmedia” no longer describes what I do, so everyone else can have it. :)

So, please excuse me as I prepare my submission for next year’s SXSW: Can Dihydrogen Monoxide Save Hollywood?

————————–

ETA: Revised some wording for clarity and to fix the emphasis of the post.

comments: 24 » tags: , ,

Rabbit Holes to Crummy Commercials: Hollywood’s Missed Opportunities

Posted on 18th March 2010 in ARG, Cool marketing, Creativity, Tech/Entertainment

Jack Bauer is driving across the African plain when his phone rings. He picks it up, and the camera gets a purposeful shot of its screen, complete with a non-555 phone number! Jack Bauer's phoneCalling it, it’s an actual number! It rings……then an answer. “Thank you for calling the Sprint/24 interactive experience!…” Hmm.

The CSI crew is tracking down evidence. They find out that a suspect has a website: LadyHeather.com. Firing up your browser, you enter the URL and…..get redirected to CBS.com.

Something’s wrong here.

As a consumer of entertainment, when I’m watching a TV show or film and something pulls me in deeper, I want to be rewarded with more story, more universe, more about what I’m experiencing. If I make the effort to go deeper, I don’t want to be rewarded with what amounts to a crummy commercial instead of content.

Over the past decade, the digital space has generally been seen as a promotional space when it comes to entertainment properties. From the very first official movie website (for the film Stargate) to today’s Facebook and iPhone apps, studios and networks have been using the Internet to promote their products, which has all been well and good, I suppose.

But in 2010, it’s time to go beyond this. It’s time for Hollywood to realize that the digital space can and should be a place where content itself can live, where the art is, where the story is. It doesn’t have to just promote the story, it can extend the story, be an integral part of it. Not a mission-critical part, necessarily, but a place where, if the audience digs deeper, they are rewarded with content that enriches the experience, not some ad that pulls them out of it.

Additionally, it doesn’t need to be branded with the network or studio all over the place. The viewer who got there knows how he or she got there, so why the need to advertise something they already have? They want more of the rich universe, or more about the character they love so much. They want to continue experiencing what they were experiencing, not get yanked out of the story to be hit over the head with marketing.

I wish I had numerous examples of instances where Hollywood has gotten it right, but alas, they’re few and far between. Heroes had a good thing going for a while (note the lack of any overt links back to NBC there). How I Met Your Mother gave it a shot. The Office is coming real close. These are the exceptions right now, although I give NBC credit for being the only US network that’s even trying to get it right!

So, do you want to stand out with your stuff, Hollywood? Then stop rewarding your audience (who loves your stuff so much that they want more of it) by bombarding them with even more ads, or sending them to your site to promote other programming, or making them bear partner promotions. Give them what they want: Ways to enrich their experience and explore your fictional world.

To drive the point home, I leave you with this. :)
(or jump to 2:20 for the climax)

comments: 13 » tags: , , , , ,

My Top 25 Movies

Posted on 1st December 2009 in Personal, Tech/Entertainment

For no particular reason, only because someone asked me recently what my favorite movies are. Here are my Top 25 Movies, in random order:

  1. Immortal Beloved
  2. The Abyss
  3. A Fish Called Wanda
  4. Blade Runner
  5. Best in Show
  6. Dirty Rotten Scoundrels
  7. Amelie
  8. The Prestige
  9. The Matrix
  10. Lost in Translation
  11. Raiders of the Lost Ark
  12. The Dark Knight
  13. Star Wars
  14. The Usual Suspects
  15. Casablanca
  16. Forbidden Planet
  17. Punchdrunk Love
  18. Wall-E
  19. Up
  20. Back to the Future
  21. Jaws
  22. The Big Lebowski
  23. Star Trek
  24. The Princess Bride
  25. The Godfather

ETA: Got to add Young Frankenstein in there, somehow….:)

comments: Comments Off tags: , ,

Surrogates: The Matrix meets Meat Space

Posted on 31st May 2009 in Tech/Entertainment

YouTube – Surrogates-Trailer.

comments: Comments Off tags: , , , , ,